<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aesthetic Appeal: Is it in our DNA? &#8211; By Kate Themel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raggedclothcafe.com/2008/04/20/aesthetic-appeal-is-it-in-our-dna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raggedclothcafe.com/2008/04/20/aesthetic-appeal-is-it-in-our-dna/</link>
	<description>Discussions and ideas about art and textile art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:36:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Themel</title>
		<link>http://raggedclothcafe.com/2008/04/20/aesthetic-appeal-is-it-in-our-dna/#comment-1879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate Themel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://junomain.wordpress.com/?p=871#comment-1879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you both for your comments.  Catherine, I have to agree with a lot of what you said.  And certainly, our DNA cannot explain every person&#039;s preferences.  But maybe there are some tendencies that are generally found across most cultures.
There was SO much data that I had to cut it down to size.  But your comment about the light/dark areas reminded me of something.  I had cut out a reference to a study of infants &amp; what kinds of colors &amp; shapes they&#039;re attracted to.  These were babies younger than 3 months old, so the assumption is they couldn&#039;t be that influenced by culture or experience.  Scientists used to think babies couldn&#039;t see color, only black &amp; white. But it turns out they can see all the colors adults do; but they just don&#039;t find pastels that interesting &amp; prefer images with high contrast (maybe not all but the overwhelming majority of cases).  
Even from birth, it seems we DO judge visual art and images.  :-)
June, I checked out Ramachandran&#039;s paper.  Great stuff!  I have to say, it makes a lot of sense to me.  It was interesting how they &quot;trained&quot; rats to prefer rectangles over squares.  Maybe our societies influence us in a similar way.
Very interesting reading out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you both for your comments.  Catherine, I have to agree with a lot of what you said.  And certainly, our DNA cannot explain every person&#8217;s preferences.  But maybe there are some tendencies that are generally found across most cultures.<br />
There was SO much data that I had to cut it down to size.  But your comment about the light/dark areas reminded me of something.  I had cut out a reference to a study of infants &amp; what kinds of colors &amp; shapes they&#8217;re attracted to.  These were babies younger than 3 months old, so the assumption is they couldn&#8217;t be that influenced by culture or experience.  Scientists used to think babies couldn&#8217;t see color, only black &amp; white. But it turns out they can see all the colors adults do; but they just don&#8217;t find pastels that interesting &amp; prefer images with high contrast (maybe not all but the overwhelming majority of cases).<br />
Even from birth, it seems we DO judge visual art and images.  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
June, I checked out Ramachandran&#8217;s paper.  Great stuff!  I have to say, it makes a lot of sense to me.  It was interesting how they &#8220;trained&#8221; rats to prefer rectangles over squares.  Maybe our societies influence us in a similar way.<br />
Very interesting reading out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

