<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Painted and Quilted: Up for Discussion, by June Underwood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raggedclothcafe.com/2008/02/25/painted-and-quilted-up-for-discussion-by-june-underwood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raggedclothcafe.com/2008/02/25/painted-and-quilted-up-for-discussion-by-june-underwood/</link>
	<description>Discussions and ideas about art and textile art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:01:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thelmasmith</title>
		<link>http://raggedclothcafe.com/2008/02/25/painted-and-quilted-up-for-discussion-by-june-underwood/#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>thelmasmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://junomain.wordpress.com/?p=770#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>I like how neatly Olga defined the big question:  &quot;In essence it is the fundamental why-make-art-in-the-form-of-a-domestic-craft question.&quot;

Like the rest of us, I have no good answer.  I do know I like the contrariness of presenting serious ideas in a medium that the world has defined as comforting.  It allows me to draw people into a work.  The serious questions sneak up because of the medium.

I was raised with textiles.  My grandmother taught me embroidery before her death when I was in first grande in a one room school house.  Cloth is definitely one of the defining parameters or domesticity.  That&#039;s that for good or bad.  I picked it up again in my forties when I had time available.

The other aspect of the continuting choice is a statement the late Arlene LewAllen made at a saqa conference in Santa Fe in 1999, &quot;Show me something I&#039;ve never seen before!&quot;  That command comes into play if, as artists, we wish to engage in the public aspects of our work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how neatly Olga defined the big question:  &#8220;In essence it is the fundamental why-make-art-in-the-form-of-a-domestic-craft question.&#8221;</p>
<p>Like the rest of us, I have no good answer.  I do know I like the contrariness of presenting serious ideas in a medium that the world has defined as comforting.  It allows me to draw people into a work.  The serious questions sneak up because of the medium.</p>
<p>I was raised with textiles.  My grandmother taught me embroidery before her death when I was in first grande in a one room school house.  Cloth is definitely one of the defining parameters or domesticity.  That&#8217;s that for good or bad.  I picked it up again in my forties when I had time available.</p>
<p>The other aspect of the continuting choice is a statement the late Arlene LewAllen made at a saqa conference in Santa Fe in 1999, &#8220;Show me something I&#8217;ve never seen before!&#8221;  That command comes into play if, as artists, we wish to engage in the public aspects of our work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
